Barthes clarification

There has been some confusion regarding the Barthes reading, so let me lay it all out here to make sure we’re all on the same page:

  • tomorrow we will wrap up our discussion of Jakobson and (I hope) get through most of the Barthes pieces (i.e., the collection in the Norton + the .pdf of the later Eiffel Tower essay on Dropbox)
  • I did not post study questions for the Barthes stuff, since it’s a bit more practical than theoretical in a sense
  • the syllabus states that a post is due for tomorrow, but since some students were confused by the lack of study questions (and, hey, I’m glad you noticed they weren’t there!), let’s have Post #3 due by Friday (you can write about Jakobson, Barthes, or de Man).

Comments ( 4 )

  1. alan carias (ac466)
    Gosh, you are soooooo kind. Thank you
  2. alan carias (ac466)
    By the way maybe you haven't gotten to me yet but you have not commented on my 2 posts and I have received no email from you in regards to my grade . Sorry but I felt I needed to remind you, I can't be left out
  3. alan carias (ac466)
    Maybe because you think I am late but I am not ...I have the wordpress app and I think the timing is wrong it's 12:02am right now but the comment says I posted at 4:01am...
    • Jeff Allred
      Problem fixed: I hadn't configured the time zone right.

Skip to toolbar